Employee Satisfaction And Performance Advantage - 1477 Words

In our community, some businesses believe that the sustaining of competition and performance advantage to becoming an excellent organization in any industry. The subject of interest is employee’s satisfaction and engagement in an organization’s. Many employees in various business industries struggle with leadership, recognizing their job performances and achievements. For example, employees search for other employment or request a transfer within the organization if he or she are dissatisfied with a current superior. Employee satisfaction is a factor in employee’s goal achievement, motivation, and positive morale in the workplace. Therefore, employees utilize their personal skills, work competencies, self-confidence, self-assurance and†¦show more content†¦However, if the leaders engaged employees input, the business outcome may have been different. Brief History The research will show how employee’s satisfaction and employee engagement is a focal point in today’s workplace because companies realize to keep happy customers, they also need to maintain their employees happiness and engaged. There are several factors in maintaining and improving employees engagement and satisfaction in an organization. Employee satisfaction creates an environment of shared responsibility for workplace culture and improvements, while employee engagement lowers turnovers and increase employee loyalty. Employees must also create an environment with the organization that encourages innovative thinking and action to share knowledge, suggestions, and recommendations. Most employee satisfaction studies have focused on an individual unit of analysis. A recent meta-analysis showed a substantial relation between individual job satisfaction versus career performances (Judge, Piccolo, Podsakoff, Shaw, Rich, 2010). There is valuable information that leaders ca n benefit from a survey, such as profitability, employee retention, productivity, customer loyalty, and safety variables. Thus, employee’s survey reported at a business level are more efficient and less dependent on review length because item-level measurements are fewer concerns (Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., Hayes,Show MoreRelatedUsing the Balanced Scorecard at the United States Postal Service1002 Words   |  5 Pagesare. The â€Å"Voice of the Employee (VOE)† was one of the first strategic areas of focus deemed most important due to the past workplace violence at the post office. The VOE placed the emphasis on providing safety and security in the workplace and improving employee relations. Our stated in our text, â€Å"Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that when service worker satisfaction is high, customer satisfaction is high, and that when job satisfaction is low, customer satisfaction is low.† (Evans LindsayRead MoreEmotional Intelligence T raining For Increased Success1351 Words   |  6 Pagesfor everyone within the company. This paper discusses the attributes associated with emotional intelligence, how these attributes manifest in a workplace environment, a plan to increase workplace motivation, satisfaction and performance is put forth, with a critical assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of the plan. To be successful in the workplace one needs both cognitive intelligence as well as emotional intelligence. According to Singh Sharma (2012) â€Å"Emotional intelligence is the abilityRead MoreJob Design and Work Diversity1463 Words   |  6 Pagesimprove individual and organisational performance Date : 25 August 2013 Introduction In the current business environment, human resource management (HRM) has become an important role for an organisation. HRM refers to the policies, practices, and systems that influence employees’ behaviour, attitudes, and performance (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, amp; Wright, 2010). It is important because HRM helps the company to achieve the goals and improve employee’s performance. One of the HRM roles is to haveRead More(Noe Et Al. 2015) The Strategic Management Process Has1445 Words   |  6 Pagesand strategic management process. The HRM will not be sharing any information about the human resource capabilities and advice analysed from HRM issue. The information about an employee will help top management to identify right strategy and strategy alternative can be implemented. The HRM function gives competitive advantage in the strategic management process (Noe, et al., 2015). Mobileum must hire an executive director for human resource management. He or she should be part of executive team committeeRead MoreDiversity Is A Strategic Advantage?1365 Words   |  6 PagesWhy do you agree or disagree that diversity is a strategic advantage? Diversity in an important aspect in the work place since the world is changing and organizations are forced to evolve with changing times. Diversity in the workplace entails bringing together different people from various backgrounds, education levels, point of views, and ways of thinking. This kind of diversity promotes innovation and is a major contributor to the cultural identity of successful organizations. Global demographicRead MoreManagement And Performance. The High-Performing Company1257 Words   |  6 PagesManagement and Performance The high-performing company that I discovered was Starbucks. If you ever drive by or go into a Starbucks you will find lots of business and smiling faces regardless of the cost of a venti coffee. The reason is it’s not just about the beverage, it is about the way the company is managed. From the decor to the service you receive is all part of the formula for their success. I will present five reasons that Starbucks is considered a high-performing organization. FirstRead MoreGm588 - Managing Quality Enhancement714 Words   |  3 PagesQuality in Practice GM588 – Managing Quality Enhancement Voice of Employee The Voice of the Employee focuses on providing a safe and secures workplace in response to instances of violence and poor employee relations (Evans, 2011). Organization utilizes the Voice of the Employee (VoE) to focus on internal processes as traditionally employees’ perspective wasn’t a top priority and not taken into consideration as far as the business was concerned. As part of anRead MoreProblem/Topic. This Project Outline And Proposal Explores766 Words   |  4 Pagesleadership and employee engagement. As research for employee engagement continues to grow, we are learning how much of an impact leadership teams affect the employee engagement levels. As we continue to explore the subject of employee engagement, we realize there is a direct correlation between leadership, organizational effectiveness and levels of engagement. Identification and background of issue The past decade has seen an explosion of research activity and heightened interest in employee engagementRead MoreImproving Business Outcomes Of Training884 Words   |  4 PagesWhen seeking approaches to improve business outcomes, training has long been an exceptional method, granting managers many significant advantages towards organizational improvement. The following will explain those advantages, the reduction of organizational disadvantages, as well as a clarification as to how this approach is able to offer such enhancements. Finally, consideration will be offered which helps describe how the desired outcomes that related to the training approach can be managed throughRead MorePlan for Positive Influence Ldr/5311243 Words   |  5 Pagesmechanisms to increase employee motivation, job satisfaction and performance as means to achieving set objectives. This plan clearly defines differences in attitude, personalities, emotions and values will be examined to create a behavioral p lan that would increase motivation, satisfaction, and performance within an organization. Motivation, job satisfaction and performance are driven by: the employer and employees. Employers control the output provided to the employees and the employee bring morels,

Essay on History of African Americans in America 1865-1960’s

History of African Americans in America 1865-1960’s Georgia Root HIS204: American History since 1865 Mark D. Bowles March 18, 2013 History of African Americans in America 1865-1960’s African Americans in America in history have gone through many hard times trying to just progress out of slavery and obtain freedom and have equal rights. In this paper I will attempt to explain what some of the important events of the time revealed about the role of African Americans in broader American society in, respectively, the 1920s and the late 1960s. I will explain how and why the roles of African Americans in the 1920s differed from their roles in the late 1960s, and explain how events in the 1920s may have contributed to†¦show more content†¦The Passing of the 15th amendment in 1868 did give black men the right to vote. They were able to vote but were not permitted because they were blocked at the poles with threats of violence and death. The violence and intimidation of the Ku Klux Klan had a lot to do with the blocking of the blacks at the voting polls. The Ku Klux Klan was a politically and racially motivated group that discouraged and frustrated attempts at racial equality (Bowles 2011). They were against all equality for anyone who supported a Union or was black. They were in control of the Southern states and they ran amuck abusing and murdering anyone they felt would threaten their way of life and the local and state governments sat back and supported their efforts to keep the blacks enslaved at all costs. In and article written by the Harper’s Weekly paper about the atrocities in the South it stated that, â€Å"If our political system really be one which forbids he government to protect its own citizens when voting for its officers,and which requires he country to look on passively while mobs controlling various State authorities harry those voters, it will certainly be necessary to reconsider some of our raptures over the infinite superiority of the American to all other possible systems of government† (H arper’s Weekly, April 1, 1871, p 282). The newspapers covered many of the social and political problems of the South because it was the best communication to theShow MoreRelatedThe Effect of Cultural and Historical Situations on American Literature 1173 Words   |  5 PagesProfessor Brattoli †American literature is almost always tied to historical and social events of the era in which it was written.† There is a connection between literary works from different time periods. This connection is how history, current events and social events have impacted American Literature. Literary works and writing styles have been affected and influence by the world around us. This is seen in many of the works assigned forRead MoreU.s. Constitution, Discrimination865 Words   |  4 PagesFaults in the U.S. Constitution, Discrimination in America One very monumental event in the history of the United States is the ratification and signing of the United States Constitution.This took place in the year 1787 .The Bill of Rights is actually the part of the constitution that defines the rights of the citizens of the United States.This significant document helped spell out individual rights and freedoms.Although the signing of the U.S. Constitution solved many problems it failed to solveRead MoreThe Influence of History on American Literature Essay1546 Words   |  7 Pagesthis statement also shows that history influences American Literature. Throughout history, there has been a connection among literary works from different periods. The connection is that History, current events, and social events have influenced American Literature. Authors, their literary works, and the specific writing styles; are affected and influenced by the world around them. Authors have long used experiences they have lived through and/or taken out of hi story to help shape and express in theirRead MoreReasons For The Civil Rights Movement1436 Words   |  6 Pagesof scattered individuals, primarily black and Jewish. This Civil Rights Movement happened in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. Some people believed that this movement began in Western New York. African Americans faced many social problems during this time period, which demonstrated the significance of organizing the black community on the neighborhood level. During that time African Americans were mistreated and fought for their equality. Who was involved in the civil rights movement in BuffaloRead MoreSummary Of Ellen Degeneres Essay1529 Words   |  7 PagesGold Medal; this is important, because many deemed this meme as racist due to America’s history of slavery. The backlash from the ad is significant, because it highlights how freedom of speech is becoming more and more restricted in our society. In America, there is a history of discrimination against African Americans, which started with slavery. Starting in 1619, African slaves were brought over to America to work on plantations to help produce crops, such as tobacco and cotton. Slaves â€Å"wereRead MoreThe Making Of A Nation1519 Words   |  7 PagesThe Making of a Nation The history of the United States could nearly not be written without the affirmation and recognition of the practice of slavery on American soil. Made to remain docile and obedient, the physical and psychological turmoil inflicted on imported humans seen merely as property has shaped and molded the very foundation this great nation stands upon. The life of a slave seemed to be that of a meager, inhumane being. They were worked until their muscles ached, beat until their skinRead MoreThe Dark Social Developments Of The United States Of African Americans894 Words   |  4 PagesThe 1960s, including the dark social developments of the period, are an obstruction to understanding the present states of African Americans, contends Clarence Lang. While Americans commend the present commemorations of different dark flexibility breakthroughs and the decision of the first dark president, the impacts of neoliberalism since the 1970s have been especially destroying to African Americans. Amid the four centuries of the Trans-Atlantic slave exchange individuals from several distinctiveRead MoreAfrican Americ A Transformation For Blacks1390 Words   |  6 Pagesnumerous southern white men. African American had their opportunity again at the same time, they needed to battle to pick up suffrage and social liberties. December 1865 imprints the most critical crossroads in history for all African American in the United States of America. Black people was free once more. They were free from bondage be that as it may, the excursion to discover their character and to get themselves were restricted. After subjugation African American were upbeat to be free in anyRead MoreRacism : A Long Way Down The American History1426 Words   |  6 Pages November 15, 2015 Racism goes a long way down the American history. It came as a result of slavery which began in 1619 when African slaves were brought to Jamestown, Virginia, which was an American colony in the North, to help in producing crops such as tobacco. Slavery was then a common practice in all American colonies through the 17th and 18th centuries, where African slaves helped in building the economic foundations of the now American nation. Slavery was then spread to the South in 1793Read MoreSlavery Is A Big Factor Of Our Nation Becoming As Powerful1444 Words   |  6 PagesIn this paper I am going to talk about why slavery was such a big factor of our nation becoming as powerful as it is today, why we needed it in the 1800’s and 1900’s, and why it was such a bad thing to do. slavery continued to influence American history, from the tumultuous years of reconstruction from 1865-1877 to the civil rights movement that emergedâ€Å"Slavery is theft -- theft of a life, theft of work, theft of any property or produce, theft even of the children a slave might have borne.† - KEVIN

Self-Designed Fictitious Study Utilizes Statistical Methodologies

Question: Describe about participants in a Leadership Training Program Rated as Better Managers Compared to Those Who do Not? Answer: Leadership training program is actually a major professional training which actually helps individuals to grow the leadership qualities to actually perform on a dignified position with adequate supervision to guide the employees to their dedicated work. But, there is always a question that basically arise that is are the participants in a leadership training program rated as better mangers compared to those who do not. In fact it is a serious and an important aspect that needs major research. It has been prolifically noticed that the there is a vast difference between leaders and management. In every aspect both are different from each other. But managers those who dont take part in the leadership training program are they not so efficient to those who take part. This study actually states the basic needs and wants of comparing the better managers (Burns, 1978). The article clearly explains every single details about the how leadership training actually differentiate the managers tho se who have not taken the training program. Experience also plays a key role making managers a prolific leader who can actually take the leaders role to boost the employees motivation and morale and help them to dedicate them towards their work. So, the module clearly states each and every pros and cons that is needed in the managerial sector and will potentially clear out the major doubts on better managers. It actually cooperates and significantly executes major roles and procedures of how without the help of leadership training program better managers are also made by experience. Experience is one major factor that increases the potential of an individual rather than training procedures and the potential of being a leader cum manager without the training program is stated in this module. Hypothesis A Hypothesis is a research made on a given topic. It is of different nature based on the requirement of the research conducted by the researcher. It can be of descriptive in nature or may be of quantitative in nature. In other words it is said to have an analysis done on a given topic. Here in this report a hypothesis is done on a given topic of Participants in a leadership training program rated better managers from those who do not participates in the leadership. For completing this hypothesis several studies were made and questionnaires were prepared to collect data regarding the given topic. A fictitious data set is prepared that shows how fifty employees of several organizations were interview and several different results were formulated from the employees (Flynn Stack, 2006). The employees interviewed were of several positions in the organizations ranging from employee level to management level. For conducting this hypothesis a fictional topic was chosen that raised several q uestions regarding the usefulness of the leadership training program for the managers to be expert in their field and compete people of the same rank in performing a better duty. The entire report is discussed in a descriptive manner and a statistical analysis is done in the section later on. Problem questions The study or report deals with the main question that how the leadership training program is helpful for the students to become efficient managers (Tracy, 2014). The entire study in the report deals with the questionnaires presented to the employee and managers of few organizations. The main questions that are discussed in this report are as follows: How often are the training members chosen as a manager? Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Personal skill development Scheme Is the Study useful? How this study is useful for the students? Is Leadership training program helpful? Effect of leadership program on the managers. Effect of Leadership program on the company. Methodology Research Design Research design is the blue print of the report that is made on a research study. It is a method of representing the research in a report manner. Different methods of research are done. Some of them are descriptive research, explanatory and exploratory research. In this report the descriptive method is use to represent the report because it requires a huge base of knowledge to complete this research work (Giuliani Kurson, 2002). The report represents how the data are collected and how it is used to complete the analysis as required completing the hypothesis. Data collection and sampling Data collection is one of the most important methods of a hypothesis. It increases the knowledge base of the research to complete the required work. In this method the secondary data collection technique is used to collect data to increase the knowledge base (Safire Safir, 1990). The data set prepared for completing the research is fictitious in nature but deals with a real worlds issue. For completing the research several questions were prepared based on the given topic and fifty cases were taken in consideration as samples for creating variables to complete the analysis. Data Analysis Data analysis is the most complicated task for any researcher. It is the most difficult part of any research. In completing this study the variables from the data set are used to complete the statistical analysis to get the outcome of the research on the given topic (Krueger, 2004). For conducting the statistical analysis SPSS software is used were the variables are represented in tables and the statistical analysis is done with the help of the data set. Here, in this report the correlation between the variables are found and the results are represented in tabular form and with the help of graphs. Research limitation Every research work has certain limitation. A researcher needs to follow the guidelines that are related to the research work. The most important limitation of a research work is the time constraint for completing the work. The time must be kept in mind while conducting a research study. Data Analysis Data analysis is the most important part of any study done on a particular topic. It is important make the analysis as per the requirement to get correct result for the variables collected from the data set. For completing the analysis in this report SPSS software is used and the data are manipulated from the data set to complete the analysis. The analysis done on the data set is given below: Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Age 50 1 4 2.24 .938 Sex 50 1 2 1.28 .454 Salary 50 2 4 2.90 .839 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 50 1 5 2.38 1.086 Is Leadership training program helpful? 50 1 5 2.68 1.096 Effect of leadership program on the managers 50 1 5 2.74 .922 Effect of Leadership program on the company 50 1 5 2.60 .969 Effect of leadership program on the industry 50 1 5 2.72 1.031 How this study is useful for the students 50 1 5 2.88 1.118 Effects on the employees 50 1 5 2.26 1.084 Are the Subject useful? 50 1 4 2.32 .891 Help in communication 50 1 4 2.44 .907 Personal skill development Scheme 50 1 5 2.76 1.041 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 50 1 5 2.46 1.164 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 50 1 5 2.62 1.048 Valid N (listwise) 50 Crosstabs Age * Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Crosstab Count Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 3 3 5 4 0 15 30-40 2 6 1 1 0 10 40-50 6 8 6 2 1 23 50-60 1 0 0 1 0 2 Total 12 17 12 8 1 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.869a 12 .540 Likelihood Ratio 11.716 12 .469 Linear-by-Linear Association .608 1 .436 N of Valid Cases 50 a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.111 .153 -.777 .441c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.121 .152 -.848 .401c N of Valid Cases 50 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Age * Is Leadership training program helpful? Crosstab Count Is Leadership training program helpful? Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 2 4 4 4 1 15 30-40 2 3 4 1 0 10 40-50 3 9 8 2 1 23 50-60 0 0 0 1 1 2 Total 7 16 16 8 3 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.410a 12 .340 Likelihood Ratio 11.036 12 .526 Linear-by-Linear Association .014 1 .907 N of Valid Cases 50 a. 18 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .12. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .017 .161 .116 .909c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.003 .156 -.021 .983c N of Valid Cases 50 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Age * Effect of leadership program on the managers Crosstab Count Effect of leadership program on the managers Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 1 6 5 2 1 15 30-40 1 3 3 3 0 10 40-50 0 12 9 2 0 23 50-60 0 0 0 1 1 2 Total 2 21 17 8 2 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 20.508a 12 .058 Likelihood Ratio 15.992 12 .192 Linear-by-Linear Association .266 1 .606 N of Valid Cases 50 a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .074 .164 .512 .611c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .046 .152 .320 .750c N of Valid Cases 50 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Age * Effect of Leadership program on the company Crosstab Count Effect of Leadership program on the company Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 6 5 4 0 0 15 30-40 0 1 7 1 1 10 40-50 0 11 7 4 1 23 50-60 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 6 17 20 5 2 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 27.455a 12 .007 Likelihood Ratio 30.165 12 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.972 1 .008 N of Valid Cases 50 a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .377 .106 2.822 .007c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .342 .127 2.522 .015c N of Valid Cases 50 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Salary * Personal skill development Scheme Crosstab Count Personal skill development Scheme Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Salary 10000-20000 2 2 8 7 1 20 20000-30000 3 7 4 1 0 15 30000-40000 2 3 6 4 0 15 Total 7 12 18 12 1 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.513a 8 .231 Likelihood Ratio 11.258 8 .188 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.386 1 .239 N of Valid Cases 50 a. 12 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .30. Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.168 .138 -1.182 .243c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.183 .143 -1.287 .204c N of Valid Cases 50 a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .393a .155 -.120 .480 a. Predictors: (Constant), How often are the training members chosen as a manager?, Effect of leadership program on the managers, Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program, Effect of Leadership program on the company, Help in communication, Are the Subject useful?, How this study is useful for the students, Is Leadership training program helpful?, Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers?, Effects on the employees, Effect of leadership program on the industry, Personal skill development Scheme. ANOVAa Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1.559 12 .130 .564 .856b Residual 8.521 37 .230 Total 10.080 49 a. Dependent Variable: Sex b. Predictors: (Constant), How often are the training members choosen as a manager?, Effect of leadership program on the managers, Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program, Effect of Leadership program on the company, Help in communication, Are the Subject useful?, How this study is useful for the students, Is Leadership training program helpful?, Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers?, Effects on the employees, Effect of leadership program on the industry, Personal skill development Scheme Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients T Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 1.016 .722 1.406 .168 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program -.040 .073 -.096 -.549 .586 Is Leadership training program helpful? .105 .068 .255 1.544 .131 Effect of leadership program on the managers .073 .084 .148 .870 .390 Effect of Leadership program on the company -.009 .073 -.020 -.128 .899 Effect of leadership program on the industry .010 .075 .022 .127 .900 How this study is useful for the students -.034 .067 -.084 -.512 .612 Effects on the employees .017 .074 .041 .232 .818 Is the Subject useful? -.046 .080 -.091 -.579 .566 Help in communication .010 .078 .020 .127 .899 Personal skill development Scheme -.070 .078 -.160 -.894 .377 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? .044 .065 .112 .670 .507 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? .040 .068 .092 .588 .560 a. Dependent Variable: Sex T-Test One-Sample Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Age 50 2.24 .938 .133 Sex 50 1.28 .454 .064 Salary 50 2.90 .839 .119 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 50 2.38 1.086 .154 Is Leadership training program helpful? 50 2.68 1.096 .155 Effect of leadership program on the managers 50 2.74 .922 .130 Effect of Leadership program on the company 50 2.60 .969 .137 Effect of leadership program on the industry 50 2.72 1.031 .146 How this study is useful for the students 50 2.88 1.118 .158 Effects on the employees 50 2.26 1.084 .153 Are the Subject useful? 50 2.32 .891 .126 Help in communication 50 2.44 .907 .128 Personal skill development Scheme 50 2.76 1.041 .147 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 50 2.46 1.164 .165 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 50 2.62 1.048 .148 One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Age 16.885 49 .000 2.240 1.97 Sex 19.956 49 .000 1.280 1.15 Salary 24.438 49 .000 2.900 2.66 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 15.498 49 .000 2.380 2.07 Is Leadership training program helpful? 17.288 49 .000 2.680 2.37 Effect of leadership program on the managers 21.022 49 .000 2.740 2.48 Effect of Leadership program on the company 18.975 49 .000 2.600 2.32 Effect of leadership program on the industry 18.656 49 .000 2.720 2.43 How this study is useful for the students 18.210 49 .000 2.880 2.56 Effects on the employees 14.737 49 .000 2.260 1.95 Are the Subject useful? 18.417 49 .000 2.320 2.07 Help in communication 19.020 49 .000 2.440 2.18 Personal skill development Scheme 18.744 49 .000 2.760 2.46 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 14.941 49 .000 2.460 2.13 How often are the training members chosen as a manager? 17.684 49 .000 2.620 2.32 One-way ANOVA Sig. Age Between Groups .120 Within Groups Total Salary Between Groups .824 Within Groups Total Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Between Groups .214 Within Groups Total Is Leadership training program helpful? Between Groups .062 Within Groups Total Effect of leadership program on the managers Between Groups .829 Within Groups Total Effect of Leadership program on the company Between Groups .898 Within Groups Total Effect of leadership program on the industry Between Groups .378 Within Groups Total How this study is useful for the students Between Groups .355 Within Groups Total Effects on the employees Between Groups .918 Within Groups Total Are the Subject useful? Between Groups .606 Within Groups Total Help in communication Between Groups .774 Within Groups ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Help in communication Total 40.320 49 Personal skill development Scheme Between Groups .691 1 .691 .633 Within Groups 52.429 48 1.092 Total 53.120 49 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Between Groups .650 1 .650 .474 Within Groups 65.770 48 1.370 Total 66.420 49 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? Between Groups 1.093 1 1.093 .996 Within Groups 52.687 48 1.098 Total 53.780 49 ANOVA Sig. Help in communication Total Personal skill development Scheme Between Groups .430 Within Groups Total Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Between Groups .494 Within Groups Total How often are the training members chosen as a manager? Between Groups .323 Within Groups Total Discussion Here in this report data analysis is done on the variables manipulated from the fictitious data set that helps to complete the statistical analysis on the given topic. All data and reports are presented in tabular form to make it easier to understand for the readers. Graphical representation of the data and results are also provided along with the results to make it understandable and interesting for the audience. Here in the analysis section the dependent variables are compared with the independent variables to find the correlation among the variables. The mean, standard deviation, regression analysis is done with the help of the variables and the results are represented in the analysis section. It can be seen that how the T-test have been conducted with the variables and an ANOVA analysis is also done in the above section. The above section deals with the statistical analysis of the data manipulated from the fictitious data set. It shows how the data are interrelated with each othe r and how they are different from each other to solve the problem arises in the questionnaires. All types of required statistical analysis is been done in the report to meet the requirement of the given topic. Conclusion The module clearly states about the does and dont that are basically need to be prolific manager at an executive or administrative level. Training is always not important in acquiring to be the best manager in any level. If we see on a wider basis we can easily conclude that rather than training experience also plays a key and significant role in becoming a major and well established manager to carry out or to carry forward the tasks that are incorporated in an organization. Basically managers are good leaders. Managers play a key role in establishing the firms orientation along with its main motive, aim and objectives. These prolific features can only be identified and taken into consideration when an individual as a manager has wide perspective of thinking to grow (Lawriwsky, 1984). The tactics, strategies, implementation of plan are all leadership qualities that actually a good manager persists which actually help them to execute major projects, works on wider basis thinking about the growth of the organization. Leadership tactics are essential in every sector. The leadership role must be well performed to bring out the major necessities from an employee making the employee motivated to keep its focus and dedication towards the work. A manager can easily acquire the leadership quality by gaining experience from different fields and sector. A manager can easily be a leader by prolifically boosting up the employees morale and motivate them and help them in their major works to help them to achieve the goal along with the organizational objectives and specific goals. Leadership and management are quite different from each other in the organizational structures to execute great plans and objectives. But it is not necessary for a manager to take any professional or any prolific training to become a dignified leader. Sometimes even experience also matters and counts which actually makes individuals better manager cum leaders without a leadership training program. References Burns, J. (1978).Leadership. New York: Harper Row. Flynn, J., Stack, M. (2006).The role of the preceptor. New York: Springer Pub. Giuliani, R., Kurson, K. (2002).Leadership. New York: Hyperion. Krueger, G. (2004).Enterprise restructuring and the role of managers in Russia. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. Lawriwsky, M. (1984).Corporate structure performance. London: Croom Helm. Safire, W., Safir, L. (1990).Leadership. New York: Simon and Schuster. Tracy, B. (2014).Leadership. New York: American Management Association. Appendices Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Age 50 1 4 2.24 .938 Sex 50 1 2 1.28 .454 Salary 50 2 4 2.90 .839 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 50 1 5 2.38 1.086 Is Leadership training program helpful? 50 1 5 2.68 1.096 Effect of leadership program on the managers 50 1 5 2.74 .922 Effect of Leadership program on the company 50 1 5 2.60 .969 Effect of leadership program on the industry 50 1 5 2.72 1.031 How this study is useful for the students 50 1 5 2.88 1.118 Effects on the employees 50 1 5 2.26 1.084 Are the Subject useful? 50 1 4 2.32 .891 Help in communication 50 1 4 2.44 .907 Personal skill development Scheme 50 1 5 2.76 1.041 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 50 1 5 2.46 1.164 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 50 1 5 2.62 1.048 Valid N (listwise) 50 Crosstabs Age * Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Crosstab Count Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 3 3 5 4 0 15 30-40 2 6 1 1 0 10 40-50 6 8 6 2 1 23 50-60 1 0 0 1 0 2 Total 12 17 12 8 1 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.869a 12 .540 Likelihood Ratio 11.716 12 .469 Linear-by-Linear Association .608 1 .436 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.111 .153 -.777 .441c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.121 .152 -.848 .401c N of Valid Cases 50 Age * Is Leadership training program helpful? Crosstab Count Is Leadership training program helpful? Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 2 4 4 4 1 15 30-40 2 3 4 1 0 10 40-50 3 9 8 2 1 23 50-60 0 0 0 1 1 2 Total 7 16 16 8 3 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 13.410a 12 .340 Likelihood Ratio 11.036 12 .526 Linear-by-Linear Association .014 1 .907 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .017 .161 .116 .909c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.003 .156 -.021 .983c N of Valid Cases 50 Age * Effect of leadership program on the managers Crosstab Count Effect of leadership program on the managers Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 1 6 5 2 1 15 30-40 1 3 3 3 0 10 40-50 0 12 9 2 0 23 50-60 0 0 0 1 1 2 Total 2 21 17 8 2 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 20.508a 12 .058 Likelihood Ratio 15.992 12 .192 Linear-by-Linear Association .266 1 .606 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .074 .164 .512 .611c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .046 .152 .320 .750c N of Valid Cases 50 Age * Effect of Leadership program on the company Crosstab Count Effect of Leadership program on the company Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 6 5 4 0 0 15 30-40 0 1 7 1 1 10 40-50 0 11 7 4 1 23 50-60 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 6 17 20 5 2 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 27.455a 12 .007 Likelihood Ratio 30.165 12 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.972 1 .008 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .377 .106 2.822 .007c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .342 .127 2.522 .015c N of Valid Cases 50 Age * Effect of leadership program on the industry Crosstab Count Effect of leadership program on the industry Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Age 20-30 0 6 5 2 2 15 30-40 0 5 2 1 2 10 Salary * Personal skill development Scheme Crosstab Count Personal skill development Scheme Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Salary 10000-20000 2 2 8 7 1 20 20000-30000 3 7 4 1 0 15 30000-40000 2 3 6 4 0 15 Total 7 12 18 12 1 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 10.513a 8 .231 Likelihood Ratio 11.258 8 .188 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.386 1 .239 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.168 .138 -1.182 .243c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.183 .143 -1.287 .204c N of Valid Cases 50 Salary * Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Crosstab Count Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Total Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Salary 10000-20000 3 12 3 0 2 20 20000-30000 4 2 4 3 2 15 30000-40000 3 6 4 2 0 15 Total 10 20 11 5 4 50 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 11.492a 8 .175 Likelihood Ratio 14.938 8 .060 Linear-by-Linear Association .036 1 .849 N of Valid Cases 50 Symmetric Measures Value Asymp. Std. Errora Approx. Tb Approx. Sig. Interval by Interval Pearson's R .027 .125 .188 .851c Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .062 .131 .429 .670c N of Valid Cases 50 Regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1 .393a .155 -.120 .480 ANOVAa Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1.559 12 .130 .564 .856b Residual 8.521 37 .230 Total 10.080 49 Coefficientsa Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients T Sig. B Std. Error Beta 1 (Constant) 1.016 .722 1.406 .168 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program -.040 .073 -.096 -.549 .586 Is Leadership training program helpful? .105 .068 .255 1.544 .131 Effect of leadership program on the managers .073 .084 .148 .870 .390 Effect of Leadership program on the company -.009 .073 -.020 -.128 .899 Effect of leadership program on the industry .010 .075 .022 .127 .900 How this study is useful for the students -.034 .067 -.084 -.512 .612 Effects on the employees .017 .074 .041 .232 .818 Are the Subject useful? -.046 .080 -.091 -.579 .566 Help in communication .010 .078 .020 .127 .899 Personal skill development Scheme -.070 .078 -.160 -.894 .377 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? .044 .065 .112 .670 .507 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? .040 .068 .092 .588 .560 T-Test One-Sample Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Age 50 2.24 .938 .133 Sex 50 1.28 .454 .064 Salary 50 2.90 .839 .119 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 50 2.38 1.086 .154 Is Leadership training program helpful? 50 2.68 1.096 .155 Effect of leadership program on the managers 50 2.74 .922 .130 Effect of Leadership program on the company 50 2.60 .969 .137 Effect of leadership program on the industry 50 2.72 1.031 .146 How this study is useful for the students 50 2.88 1.118 .158 Effects on the employees 50 2.26 1.084 .153 Are the Subject useful? 50 2.32 .891 .126 Help in communication 50 2.44 .907 .128 Personal skill development Scheme 50 2.76 1.041 .147 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 50 2.46 1.164 .165 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 50 2.62 1.048 .148 One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Age 16.885 49 .000 2.240 1.97 Sex 19.956 49 .000 1.280 1.15 Salary 24.438 49 .000 2.900 2.66 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 15.498 49 .000 2.380 2.07 Is Leadership training program helpful? 17.288 49 .000 2.680 2.37 Effect of leadership program on the managers 21.022 49 .000 2.740 2.48 Effect of Leadership program on the company 18.975 49 .000 2.600 2.32 Effect of leadership program on the industry 18.656 49 .000 2.720 2.43 How this study is useful for the students 18.210 49 .000 2.880 2.56 Effects on the employees 14.737 49 .000 2.260 1.95 Are the Subject useful? 18.417 49 .000 2.320 2.07 Help in communication 19.020 49 .000 2.440 2.18 Personal skill development Scheme 18.744 49 .000 2.760 2.46 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 14.941 49 .000 2.460 2.13 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 17.684 49 .000 2.620 2.32 One-Sample Test Test Value = 0 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Upper Age 2.51 Sex 1.41 Salary 3.14 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program 2.69 Is Leadership training program helpful? 2.99 Effect of leadership program on the managers 3.00 Effect of Leadership program on the company 2.88 Effect of leadership program on the industry 3.01 How this study is useful for the students 3.20 Effects on the employees 2.57 Are the Subject useful? 2.57 Help in communication 2.70 Personal skill development Scheme 3.06 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? 2.79 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? 2.92 One-way ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Age Between Groups 2.136 1 2.136 2.502 Within Groups 40.984 48 .854 Total 43.120 49 Salary Between Groups .036 1 .036 .050 Within Groups 34.464 48 .718 Total 34.500 49 Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Between Groups 1.851 1 1.851 1.589 Within Groups 55.929 48 1.165 Total 57.780 49 Is Leadership training program helpful? Between Groups 4.166 1 4.166 3.655 Within Groups 54.714 48 1.140 Total 58.880 49 Effect of leadership program on the managers Between Groups .041 1 .041 .047 Within Groups 41.579 48 .866 Total 41.620 49 Effect of Leadership program on the company Between Groups .016 1 .016 .017 Within Groups 45.984 48 .958 Total 46.000 49 Effect of leadership program on the industry Between Groups .846 1 .846 .792 Within Groups 51.234 48 1.067 Total 52.080 49 How this study is useful for the students Between Groups 1.093 1 1.093 .872 Within Groups 60.187 48 1.254 Total 61.280 49 Effects on the employees Between Groups .013 1 .013 .011 Within Groups 57.607 48 1.200 Total 57.620 49 Are the Subject useful? Between Groups .217 1 .217 .270 Within Groups 38.663 48 .805 Total 38.880 49 Help in communication Between Groups .070 1 .070 .083 Within Groups 40.250 48 .839 ANOVA Sig. Age Between Groups .120 Within Groups Total Salary Between Groups .824 Within Groups Total Are they were member of the Leadership Training Program Between Groups .214 Within Groups Total Is Leadership training program helpful? Between Groups .062 Within Groups Total Effect of leadership program on the managers Between Groups .829 Within Groups Total Effect of Leadership program on the company Between Groups .898 Within Groups Total Effect of leadership program on the industry Between Groups .378 Within Groups Total How this study is useful for the students Between Groups .355 Within Groups Total Effects on the employees Between Groups .918 Within Groups Total Are the Subject useful? Between Groups .606 Within Groups Total Help in communication Between Groups .774 Within Groups ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Help in communication Total 40.320 49 Personal skill development Scheme Between Groups .691 1 .691 .633 Within Groups 52.429 48 1.092 Total 53.120 49 Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Between Groups .650 1 .650 .474 Within Groups 65.770 48 1.370 Total 66.420 49 How often are the training members choosen as a manager? Between Groups 1.093 1 1.093 .996 Within Groups 52.687 48 1.098 Total 53.780 49 ANOVA Sig. Help in communication Total Personal skill development Scheme Between Groups .430 Within Groups Total Are Participants of leadership programs better Mangers? Between Groups .494 Within Groups Total How often are the training members chosen as a manager? Between Groups .323 Within Groups Total

Volleyball Essay Summary Example For Students

Volleyball Essay Summary The sport of volleyball originated in the United States, and is now just achieving the type of popularity in the U.S. that it has received on a global basis, where it ranks behind only soccer among participation sports. Today there are more than 46 million Americans who play volleyball. There are 800 million players worldwide who play Volleyball at least once a week. In 1895, William G. Morgan an instructor at the Young Mens Christian Association (YMCA) in Holyoke, Mass., decided to blend elements of basketball, baseball, tennis, and handball to create a game for his classes of businessmen which would demand less physical contact than basketball. He created the game of Volleyball (at that time called mintonette). Morgan borrowed the net from tennis, and raised it 6 feet 6 inches above the floor, just above the average mans head. During a demonstration game, someone remarked to Morgan that the players seemed to be volleying the ball back and forth over the net, and perhaps volleyball would be a more descriptive name for the sport. On July 7, 1900 at Springfield College the first game of volleyball was played. In 1900, a special ball was designed for the sport. Volleyball can be played indoors and outdoors. It was adopted as an indoor Olympic sport in 1964 at Tokyo. In 1984 the United States men and women won their first Olympic Volleyball medals. In 1996, two-person beach volleyball was approved as an Olympic Sport. Todays NCAA Volleyball is more popular and exciting than ever. Some top collegian programs include Long Beach State, Penn State, BYU, UCLA, Hawaii and Stanford. We will write a custom essay on Volleyball Summary specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Some of the best players ever to play the sport include Karch Kiraly, Gabrielle Reese, Sinjin Smith, Misty May and Ryan Millar. Today the game of volleyball requires team strategies and highly refined individual skills. Outdoor volleyball, which is played with two or four people for each side, is becoming more and more popular across the nationA typical volleyball game lasts about 25 minutes. It is a team sport played by two teams consisting of six people on a playing court divided by a net. The object of the game is for each team to send the ball regularly over a net in order to ground it on the opponents side, and to prevent the opponents from doing the same. The ball is put into play by the right back row player who serves the ball into their opponents court. The rally continues until the ball is grounded on the playing court, goes out or a team fails to return it properly. Only the team, which is serving, can score a point. The players are split into back and front row; the playe rs in the front are usually the key hitters and the ones who will get the ball passes/set to. The players in the back row normally concentrate on defense and passing the ball to the setter who is the main person in the offensive attack. A team wins a game by scoring 15 points with a two-point advantage; and the match by winning the best three of five games. In a deciding, fifth game, which is called a rally game, a point is scored no matter which team is serving. A team earns a point when serving and when they side-out. A team is allowed to hit the ball three times (not counting a block contact) to return it to the opponents court. A player may not catch, lift, scoop, or throw the ball. They also may not hit the ball twice consecutively when attempting a pass or block. In a regular volleyball game, only the serving team may score a point. A player may serve anywhere behind the backline, but between the courts boundary/side lines. A point is scored if the serving team wins the rally. If the serving team does not win the rally then it is a side-out to the other team. When the receiving team wins a rally, it gains the right to serve, and its players rotate one position clockwise. For instance, the player in the right back move to middle back, the player in left back moves to left front. Rotation ensures that players play both the front row